Monthly drivers report and popular 3D accelerators comparison
Monthy 3Digest is the project of iXBT.com and Digit-Life.com dedicated to informing you about the performance of a large number of graphics cards under Windows XP in the past month. This issue is dedicated drivers released from the 15th of March 2007 to the 15th of April 2007. Traditionally our 3Digest informs you about the best price/performance ratios available in the market. Another very important part of any 3Digest is cards' 3D graphics quality shown on the example of a wide selection of games.
It's our 83th issue of 3Digest.
April 2007
We have added test results for GeForce 8800 GTS 320MB, GeForce 8600 GTS, GeForce 8800 Ultra, and overclocked GeForce 8800 GTX.
Attention! This digest contains benchmarking results for PCI-E cards only!
The final AGP
benchmarking was conducted in March 2006!
CONTENTS
- Testbed configurations and test software
- Tested graphics cards
- What's new in 3Digest
- Test summary diagrams and digest bottom line
- D accelerator rating calculations for the end of the month
- Screenshot gallery
- Games quality section
- Game Quality Control Section
1. Testbed configuration
- Intel Core2 Duo (775 Socket) based machine
- Intel Core2 Duo Extreme X6800 (2930 MHz) (L2=4096K) CPU;
- EVGA nForce 680i SLI motherboard on NVIDIA nForce 680i;
- 2GB DDR2 SDRAM Corsair 1142MHz (CAS (tCL)=5; RAS to CAS delay (tRCD)=5; Row Precharge (tRP)=5; tRAS=15);
- WD Caviar SE WD1600JD 160GB SATA HDD.
All testbeds have Windows XP Professional Service Pack 2, DirectX 9.0c installed. Dell 3007WFP monitor was used. (30").
The list of benchmarks is here
2. Videocard list
Below is a list of graphics cards that we tested linked to the respective
3Digest feature description pages.
You can see the quality of 3D produced by tested cards
in our monthly updated Screenshot gallery.
Cards list:
- PCI-E-ATI
RADEON X1300 256MB DDR 2.8ns (450/550 MHz)
- PCI-E-ATI
RADEON X1300 512MB DDR2 3.0ns (450/500 MHz)
- PCI-E-ATI
RADEON X1300 PRO 256MB DDR 2.5ns (600/800 MHz)
- PCI-E-ATI
RADEON X1300 XT 256MB DDR2 2.0ns (500/900 MHz)
- PCI-E-ATI
RADEON X1650 PRO 256MB DDR 1.4ns (590/1380 MHz)
- PCI-E-ATI
RADEON X1650 XT 256MB DDR 1.4ns (600/1400 MHz)
- PCI-E-ATI
RADEON X1650 XT 256MB DDR 1.2ns (625/1530 MHz)
- PCI-E-ATI
RADEON X1800 GTO 256MB GDDR3 2.0ns (500/1000 MHz)
- PCI-E-ATI
RADEON X1950 PRO 256MB GDDR3 1.4ns (580/1400 MHz)
- PCI-E-ATI
RADEON X1950 PRO 256MB GDDR3 1.2ns (635/1480 MHz)
- PCI-E-ATI
RADEON X1950 PRO 512MB GDDR3 1.4ns (573/1360 MHz)
- PCI-E-ATI
RADEON X1900 XT 256MB GDDR3 1.2ns (625/1450 MHz)
- PCI-E-ATI
RADEON X1900 XT 512MB GDDR3 1.2ns (625/1450 MHz)
- PCI-E-ATI
RADEON X1900 XTX 512MB GDDR3 1.1ns (650/1550 MHz)
- PCI-E-ATI
RADEON X1950 XTX 512MB GDDR4 0.9ns (650/2000 MHz)
- PCI-E-ATI
RADEON X1950 XT 512MB GDDR4 0.9ns (625/1800 MHz)
- PCI-E-NVIDIA
GeForce 7600GT 256MB GDDR3 1.4ns (560/1400 MHz)
- PCI-E-NVIDIA
GeForce 7600GS 256MB GDDR2 2.5ns (400/800 MHz)
- PCI-E-NVIDIA
GeForce 7600GS 512MB GDDR2 2.0ns (550/950 MHz)
- PCI-E-NVIDIA
GeForce 7600GS 256MB GDDR3 1.2ns (450/1100 MHz)
PCI-E-NVIDIA
GeForce 8600 GTS 256MB GDDR3 1.0ns (675/2000 MHz)
PCI-E-NVIDIA
GeForce 8600 GTS 256MB GDDR3 1.0ns (720/2200 MHz)
- PCI-E-NVIDIA
GeForce 7900 GS 256MB GDDR3 1.4ns (450/1320 MHz)
- PCI-E-NVIDIA
GeForce 7900 GS 256MB GDDR3 1.4ns (480/1400 MHz)
- PCI-E-NVIDIA
GeForce 7900 GS 256MB GDDR3 1.4ns (540/1500 MHz)
- PCI-E-NVIDIA
GeForce 7950 GT 512MB GDDR3 1.4ns (550/1400 MHz)
- PCI-E-NVIDIA
GeForce 7950 GT 256MB GDDR3 1.4ns (600/1430 MHz)
- PCI-E-NVIDIA
GeForce 7950 GX2 2x512MB GDDR3 1.4ns (500/1200 MHz)
- PCI-E-NVIDIA GeForce 7950 GX2 SLI 2x2x512MB GDDR3 1.4ns
(4x500/1200 MHz)
PCI-E-NVIDIA
GeForce 8800 GTS 320MB GDDR3 1.2ns (512/1600 MHz)
- PCI-E-NVIDIA
GeForce 8800 GTS 640MB GDDR3 1.2ns (512/1600 MHz)
- PCI-E-NVIDIA
GeForce 8800 GTX 768MB GDDR3 1.1ns (575/1800 MHz)
PCI-E-NVIDIA
GeForce 8800 GTX 768MB GDDR3 1.1ns (625/2000 MHz)
PCI-E-NVIDIA
GeForce 8800 Ultra 768MB GDDR3 0.8ns (612/2160 MHz)
- PCI-E-NVIDIA GeForce 8800
GTX SLI 2x768MB GDDR3 1.1ns (2x575/1800 MHz)
Archive
(videocards, information on which is no longer updated)
3. April 2007 news and matters
Added a number of new graphics cards (marked "NEW").
- 3.1. The following drivers were released from March 15, 2007 to
April 15, 2007:
- NVIDIA ForceWare for all NVIDIA cards:
- ATI Catalyst for all ATI cards:
- 3.2. This month we used 158.19 drivers for NVIDIA-based card summaries,
7.4 drivers for ATI-based card summaries.
4. Summary charts of graphics card performance with the latest drivers
available at the moment of testing in April 2007
All willing to see the complete results in Excel 2003 format can
download this RAR
3.0 or this ZIP
archive.
If you are familiar with 3D graphics, you will be able to draw all
the conclusions yourself after looking at the charts provided. Those
interested in our judgement of test results should see reviews dedicated
to specific GPUs (see our 3D
graphics section). And for newbies and those who has just started
choosing a graphics card we'll provide some more detailed explanations.
First of all, you should take a look at our brief references of modern
graphics card series and their respective GPUs. Note clock rates,
shader support and pipeline architecture.
Secondly, in our 3D graphics
section all newbies can read about the basics of 3D (this knowledge
will be required anyway, because you'll surely try to adjust some
game settings: textures, lighting, etc.) Besides, newbies should read
separate reviews dedicated to new products. There are just two GPU
vendors: ATI (recently merged with AMD under its brand) and NVIDIA.
Thus, all information is generally separated in two parts.
Thirdly, let's see the charts and make conclusions.
Attention! Due to some technical issues some test results
became interchanged. Tests of GeForce 8800 GTS 320 / 640MB at 2560x1600
were conducted separately. And due to a mistake in input of numbers
for SOME tests the results of 8800 GTS 320MB became interchanged with
those of 8800 GTS 640MB and vice versa. We emphasize, this is ONLY
about 2560x1600 and SOME tests. All other results are in their right
places. We'll fix these errors next digest. Note that we've already
fixed them in test result tables.
- 4.1. Far Cry, Research (No HDR)
- 4.2. Far Cry, Research (HDR)
- 4.3. Splinter Cell Chaos Theory (No HDR)
- 4.4. Splinter Cell Chaos Theory (HDR)
- 4.5. Call Of Juarez
- 4.6. Prey
- 4.7. 3DMark05 MARKS
- 4.8. Company Of Heroes
- 4.9. F.E.A.R.
- 4.10. Serious Sam II (No HDR)
- 4.11. Serious Sam II (HDR)
- 4.12. 3DMark 06, Shader Model 2.0 MARKS
- 4.13. 3DMark 06, Shader Model 3.0 MARKS
- 4.14.
Archive (information from the previous 3Digests absent in this issue)
- 4.15. Notes on graphics cards performance with the latest drivers:
- If a particular card is not in the summary, i.e. its results
are either 0, or 1, it means the given benchmark hasn't work
or has worked incorrectly with this card.
- We must especially underline the bad quality of WinXP drivers
for NVIDIA 8800 series. For example, they do not allow DVI scalability
of resolution. Besides, SLI still doesn't work in Call Of Juarez.
Therefore SLI configurations have performance results even lower
than those of single cards in these tests.
- If you imagine a line connecting ends of columns representing
test results on a chart, you can judge if a game is critical
to a card or a CPU. If this curve is "convex" and
many cards perform similarly, it means at this resolution and
under this load performance is bottlenecked by system resources,
not graphics card potential. If, vice versa, the curve is "concave"
and performance drops quickly as card potential reduces, it
means the game puts heavy load on graphics cards and depends
exclusively on their potential.
5. 3D accelerator ratings calculations for the end of the month
Calculations were based on gaming benchmark results as well
as the results from 3DMark06 new tests (ATI CATALYST 6.12, NVIDIA
ForceWare 96.97).
Anyone who wants to conduct his own rating calculations with his
own values may download this Excel table (Office XP) in RAR
3.0 or ZIP
format.
The method of rating calculation is described here.
Calculations were conducted considering the following assumptions:
- Percentage of performance and quality demand ratio:
- performance priority - 60%
- quality priority - 40%
- Only the HIGHEST resolution available in games was used to
calculate prospect ratings.
- The usability rating indicates performance and features of
a card (numerator) related to its price (denominator).
According to your wishes, we separated ratings into
two groups: the first gathers all benchmarks, and the second contains
only the gaming tests without m3DMark05/06. Disbelieving the synthetic
tests, many think the second group is of higher importance.
Core2 Duo X6800 platform:
"Usability" Rating:
GAMING ONLY usability rating
| # |
Card |
Usability Rating |
Prospect Rating |
Price |
| 01. |
8800 GTS 320MB, 512/1600 |
728
|
1057
|
|
| 02. |
X1900 XT 512MB, 625/1450 |
694
|
825
|
|
| 03. |
X1950 PRO 256MB, 580/1400 |
688
|
690
|
|
| 04. |
X1900 XTX 512MB, 650/1550 |
657
|
851
|
|
| 05. |
8800 GTS 640MB, 512/1600 |
631
|
1086
|
|
| 06. |
X1950 PRO 256MB, 635/1485 |
626
|
711
|
|
| 07. |
X1950 XT 512MB, 625/1800 |
593
|
870
|
|
| 08. |
X1650 PRO 256MB 590/1380 |
567
|
428
|
|
| 09. |
X1950 PRO 512MB, 575/1370 |
567
|
730
|
|
| 10. |
X1300 XT 256MB 500/800 |
560
|
359
|
|
| 11. |
8800 GTX 768MB, 575/1800 |
552
|
1302
|
|
| 12. |
EVGA 8800 GTX 768MB, 625/2000 |
519
|
1372
|
|
| 13. |
X1650 XT 256MB, 600/1400 |
519
|
527
|
|
| 14. |
X1900 XT 256MB, 625/1450 |
516
|
787
|
|
| 15. |
X1650 XT 256MB, 625/1540 |
506
|
549
|
|
| 16. |
8600 GTS 256MB, 675/2000 |
460
|
710
|
|
| 17. |
8600 GTS 256MB, 720/2200 |
448
|
722
|
|
| 18. |
X1950 XTX 512MB, 650/2000 |
437
|
880
|
|
| 19. |
X1800 GTO 256MB 500/1000 |
382
|
547
|
|
| 20. |
8800 Ultra 768MB, 612/2160 |
378
|
1383
|
|
| 21. |
X1300 PRO 256MB, 600/800 |
367
|
299
|
|
| 22. |
8800 GTX SLI 2x768MB, 575/1800 |
353
|
1580
|
|
| 23. |
7900 GS 256MB, 540/1500 |
328
|
502
|
|
| 24. |
7600 GS 256MB, 450/1100 |
322
|
366
|
|
| 25. |
7900 GS 256MB, 480/1400 |
319
|
485
|
|
| 26. |
7900 GS 256MB, 450/1320 |
316
|
468
|
|
| 27. |
7600 GT 256MB, 560/1400 |
307
|
400
|
|
| 28. |
7600 GS 256MB, 400/800 |
295
|
327
|
|
| 29. |
7950 GT 256MB 600/1430 |
286
|
535
|
|
| 30. |
X1300 256MB, 450/550 |
269
|
243
|
|
| 31. |
7600 GS 512MB, 550/950 |
267
|
366
|
|
| 32. |
7950 GT 512MB 550/1400 |
251
|
525
|
|
| 33. |
X1300 512MB, 450/500 |
243
|
252
|
|
| 34. |
BFG 7950GX2 2x512MB, 500/1200 |
171
|
638
|
|
| 35. |
7950GX2 SLI 2x2x512MB, 500/1200 |
101
|
728
|
|
GENERAL usability rating
| # |
Card |
Usability Rating |
Prospect Rating |
Price |
| 01. |
8800 GTS 320MB, 512/1600 |
1873
|
1719
|
|
| 02. |
X1950 PRO 256MB, 580/1400 |
1661
|
1080
|
|
| 03. |
X1900 XT 512MB, 625/1450 |
1657
|
1285
|
|
| 04. |
X1900 XTX 512MB, 650/1550 |
1569
|
1325
|
|
| 05. |
8800 GTS 640MB, 512/1600 |
1520
|
1700
|
|
| 06. |
X1950 PRO 256MB, 635/1485 |
1509
|
1111
|
|
| 07. |
X1950 XT 512MB, 625/1800 |
1422
|
1362
|
|
| 08. |
X1650 PRO 256MB 590/1380 |
1398
|
675
|
|
| 09. |
X1950 PRO 512MB, 575/1370 |
1372
|
1148
|
|
| 10. |
X1300 XT 256MB 500/800 |
1365
|
563
|
|
| 11. |
8800 GTX 768MB, 575/1800 |
1334
|
2042
|
|
| 12. |
EVGA 8800 GTX 768MB, 625/2000 |
1281
|
2180
|
|
| 13. |
X1650 XT 256MB, 600/1400 |
1243
|
820
|
|
| 14. |
X1900 XT 256MB, 625/1450 |
1234
|
1225
|
|
| 15. |
X1650 XT 256MB, 625/1540 |
1222
|
860
|
|
| 16. |
8600 GTS 256MB, 675/2000 |
1096
|
1108
|
|
| 17. |
8600 GTS 256MB, 720/2200 |
1060
|
1124
|
|
| 18. |
X1950 XTX 512MB, 650/2000 |
1043
|
1370
|
|
| 19. |
8800 GTX SLI 2x768MB, 575/1800 |
929
|
2588
|
|
| 20. |
X1800 GTO 256MB 500/1000 |
897
|
842
|
|
| 21. |
X1300 PRO 256MB, 600/800 |
887
|
465
|
|
| 22. |
8800 Ultra 768MB, 612/2160 |
860
|
2106
|
|
| 23. |
7900 GS 256MB, 540/1500 |
724
|
752
|
|
| 24. |
7600 GS 256MB, 450/1100 |
714
|
547
|
|
| 25. |
7900 GS 256MB, 480/1400 |
702
|
725
|
|
| 26. |
7900 GS 256MB, 450/1320 |
695
|
701
|
|
| 27. |
7600 GT 256MB, 560/1400 |
682
|
601
|
|
| 28. |
7600 GS 256MB, 400/800 |
654
|
491
|
|
| 29. |
X1300 256MB, 450/550 |
645
|
379
|
|
| 30. |
7950 GT 256MB 600/1430 |
635
|
804
|
|
| 31. |
X1300 512MB, 450/500 |
600
|
400
|
|
| 32. |
7600 GS 512MB, 550/950 |
597
|
551
|
|
| 33. |
7950 GT 512MB 550/1400 |
556
|
790
|
|
| 34. |
BFG 7950GX2 2x512MB, 500/1200 |
394
|
974
|
|
| 35. |
7950GX2 SLI 2x2x512MB, 500/1200 |
246
|
1145
|
|
"Prospect" Rating:
GAMING ONLY prospect rating
| # |
Card |
Usability Rating |
Prospect Rating |
Price |
| 01. |
8800 GTX SLI 2x768MB, 575/1800 |
353
|
1580
|
|
| 02. |
8800 Ultra 768MB, 612/2160 |
378
|
1383
|
|
| 03. |
EVGA 8800 GTX 768MB, 625/2000 |
519
|
1372
|
|
| 04. |
8800 GTX 768MB, 575/1800 |
552
|
1302
|
|
| 05. |
8800 GTS 640MB, 512/1600 |
631
|
1086
|
|
| 06. |
8800 GTS 320MB, 512/1600 |
728
|
1057
|
| |