Digit-Life :: Computer Hardware In Detail

Platform

Video

Multimedia

Mobile

Other

ATI RADEON X700XT (RV410):
Part 1 - Performance.


 Discuss


 Comment

Contents

  1. Official specifications
  2. Architecture
  3. Video cards' features
  4. Testbed configurations, benchmarks, 2D quality
  5. Synthetic tests in D3D RightMark
  6. Synthetic tests in 3DMark03: FillRate Multitexturing
  7. Synthetic tests in 3DMark03: Vertex Shaders
  8. Synthetic tests in 3DMark03: Pixel Shaders
  9. Test results: Quake3 ARENA
  10. Test results: Serious Sam: The Second Encounter
  11. Test results: Return to Castle Wolfenstein
  12. Test results: Code Creatures DEMO
  13. Test results: Unreal Tournament 2003
  14. Test results: Unreal II: The Awakening
  15. Test results: RightMark 3D
  16. Test results: TRAOD
  17. Test results: FarCry
  18. Test results: Call Of Duty
  19. Test results: HALO: Combat Evolved
  20. Test results: Half-Life2(beta)
  21. Test results: Splinter Cell
  22. Test results: DOOM III
  23. Test results: 3DMark03 Game1
  24. Test results: 3DMark03 Game2
  25. Test results: 3DMark03 Game3
  26. Test results: 3DMark03 Game4
  27. Test results: 3DMark03 MARKS
  28. Conclusions

Splinter Cell



6600GT defeated X700XT in all respects.

Thus, on the whole:

  • RADEON X700XT versus RADEON 9800 PRO (ATHLON64 3400+) - victory
  • RADEON X700XT versus RADEON 9800 XT (ATHLON64 3400+) - approximate parity
  • RADEON X700XT versus GeForce 6600GT - defeat
  • RADEON X700XT versus GeForce 6800LE (ATHLON64 3400+) - complete fiasco!
  • RADEON X700XT with the LOW OPTIMIZATION versus RADEON X700XT WITHOUT OPTIMIZATIONS - no effect
  • RADEON X700XT with the HIGH OPTIMIZATION versus RADEON X700XT WITHOUT OPTIMIZATIONS - the same picture

DOOM III



I think there is no point in reviewing the X700XT/6600GT comparison mode by mode, since it's crystal clear that X700XT is totally defeated!

Thus, on the whole:

  • RADEON X700XT versus RADEON 9800 PRO (ATHLON64 3400+) - splendid success (however, it's expectable because its frequency is much higher)
  • RADEON X700XT versus RADEON 9800 XT (ATHLON64 3400+) - the same picture (only in higher resolutions the low memory bandwidth of X700XT slightly spoilt the results)
  • RADEON X700XT versus GeForce 6600GT - COMPLETE DEFEAT OF X700XT
  • RADEON X700XT versus GeForce 6800LE (ATHLON64 3400+) - THE SAME RESULTS
  • RADEON X700XT with the LOW OPTIMIZATION versus RADEON X700XT WITHOUT OPTIMIZATIONS - wow!!! Just look at the performance gain provided by the optimizations!!! The quality analysis is urgently needed, though it'll be very difficult considering a huge number of dark scenes, where it's hard to make out details
  • RADEON X700XT with the HIGH OPTIMIZATIONS versus RADEON X700XT WITHOUT OPTIMIZATIONS - the same picture

You should also pay attention to the negligible performance gain provided by the optimizations in 6600GT. Though you should take into account that it concerns only the trilinear filtering and AF, but not the entire optimization of the game (including shader substitution).

[ The previous part (8) ]

[ The next part (10) ]


We express our thanks to ATI
for the video cards provided to our lab.


Andrey Vorobiev (anvakams@ixbt.com)
Alexander Medvedev (unclesam@ixbt.com)

October 5, 2004


Comments

Register   Restore password       


  Total: 0

  Most Popular Reviews More   RSS  
  Latest Reviews More   RSS  
  Latest News More   RSS  
  Sponsored Links Get listed  
  • Visit ECost Software to find the latest and cheapest computer software
  • Choose from thousands of computer products at CheckCost UK
  Latest Threads More   Register  
 

Platform  ·  Video  ·  Multimedia  ·  Mobile  ·  Other  ·  Compare Prices  ||  Feedback  ·  Advertise at Digit-Life  ·  About us  ·  Affiliates  ·  Forum


Copyright © 1997—2008: Byrds Research & Publishing, Ltd. All rights reserved.